Method

PB-MOT: Pose-aware Association Boosted Online 3D Multi-Object Tracking [on] [PB-MOT]


Submitted on 1 Mar. 2025 15:13 by
Bo Pang (Zhejiang University)

Running time:4e-4 s
Environment:>8 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)

Method Description:
Traditional 3D MOT approaches face critical
challenges: geometric similarity metrics (e.g., IoU-
based) degrade at long ranges with high
computational costs, while distance-based methods
fail to capture object orientation and shape; the
effects of occlusion and the intricate relative ego-
object motion degrade tracking performance in
dynamic scenes. To this end, we propose PB-MOT, an
online framework integrating two key innovations:
ego-motion-compensated state estimation that
decouples dynamic interactions; and a rotated
ellipse association algorithm unifying pose and
shape-aware matching with adaptive distance
constraints. Evaluations on the KITTI benchmark show
that our PB-MOT achieves state-of-the-art
performance with a HOTA score of 81.94%, while
running at an impressive 2,402.76 FPS on CPU. This
enables real-time, high-fidelity perception and
tracking for resource-constrained robotic systems.
Parameters:
N/A
Latex Bibtex:
@INPROCEEDINGS{11247375,
author={Pang, Bo and Xu, Yang and Chen, Jiming and
Li, Liang},
booktitle={2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference
on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)},
title={PB-MOT: Pose-aware Association Boosted
Online 3D Multi-Object Tracking},
year={2025},
volume={},
number={},
pages={14170-14177},
keywords={Measurement;Technological
innovation;Three-dimensional
displays;Tracking;Heuristic
algorithms;Dynamics;Robustness;Real-time
systems;Computational efficiency;State estimation},
doi={10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11247375}}

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2]. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA MODP
CAR 91.43 % 86.80 % 91.50 % 89.44 %

Benchmark recall precision F1 TP FP FN FAR #objects #trajectories
CAR 95.74 % 96.70 % 96.22 % 37226 1269 1656 11.41 % 43622 1049

Benchmark MT PT ML IDS FRAG
CAR 86.92 % 11.54 % 1.54 % 22 197

This table as LaTeX


[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker