From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
93.32 % |
87.45 % |
93.37 % |
90.11 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
95.20 % |
98.97 % |
97.04 % |
37406 |
391 |
1888 |
3.51 % |
43620 |
741 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
89.08 % |
5.85 % |
5.08 % |
17 |
43 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.
