From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
89.91 % |
85.50 % |
89.97 % |
88.35 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
91.13 % |
99.60 % |
95.18 % |
34043 |
137 |
3313 |
1.23 % |
38015 |
780 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
77.85 % |
18.15 % |
4.00 % |
21 |
259 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.