Method

AGTrack(online): Adaptive Kalman Filtering and Geometric Similarity for 3D MOT [on] [AGTrack(online)]


Submitted on 28 Aug. 2026 09:52 by
wang weihan (吉林大学)

Running time:0.05 s
Environment:1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)

Method Description:
AGTrack is a novel 3D multi-object tracking
framework designed for autonomous driving
perception systems. It introduces a geometry-aware
3D Rotation-Shape IoU (3D-RSIoU) metric that
comprehensively models rotation alignment and
shape characteristics for more accurate data
association. Additionally, the framework
incorporates an adaptive Kalman filter that
dynamically adjusts noise parameters based on
real-time detection quality and prediction-
observation discrepancies, enhancing state
estimation robustness in complex motion scenarios.
The system operates within a single-stage matching
architecture, maintaining high efficiency while
achieving accuracy comparable to multi-stage
methods.
Parameters:
\lamda_1=1, \lamda_2=1, \lamda_3=0.5, \lamda_4=0.5
Latex Bibtex:
@INPROCEEDINGS{11637544,
author={Zhang, Biao and Wang, Weihan and Yu, Kai
and Bi, Chengding and Sun, Yupeng and Lin, Ye and
Jia, Jiwei},
booktitle={2026 7th International Conference on
Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning (CVIDL)},
title={AGTrack: A 3D Multi-Object Tracking
Framework With Adaptive Kalman Filtering and
Geometric Similarity Perception},
year={2026},
volume={},
number={},
pages={932-940},
keywords={Kalman filters;Signal
detection;Modeling;Noise;Object
tracking;Tracking;Measurement;Printing;Equations;C
onferences;3D Multi-Object Tracking;Adaptive
Kalman Filter;Geometric Similarity},
doi={10.1109/CVIDL70130.2026.11637544}}

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2]. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA MODP
CAR 89.96 % 87.04 % 90.07 % 89.62 %

Benchmark recall precision F1 TP FP FN FAR #objects #trajectories
CAR 94.48 % 96.77 % 95.61 % 37225 1241 2175 11.16 % 43312 1071

Benchmark MT PT ML IDS FRAG
CAR 86.15 % 12.46 % 1.38 % 37 381

This table as LaTeX

[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker