Method

Anonymous [Anonymous]
[Anonymous Submission]

Submitted on 30 Mar. 2026 17:00 by
[Anonymous Submission]

Running time:1e-4 s
Environment:1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)

Method Description:
Anonymous
Parameters:
Anonymous
Latex Bibtex:
Anonymous

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the HOTA tracking metrics (HOTA, DetA, AssA, DetRe, DetPr, AssRe, AssPr, LocA) [1] as well as the CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentation [2,3] metrics. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark HOTA DetA AssA DetRe DetPr AssRe AssPr LocA
CAR 83.16 % 79.94 % 87.23 % 85.26 % 85.51 % 89.93 % 91.75 % 87.94 %

Benchmark TP FP FN
CAR 33057 1335 1235

Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA IDSW sMOTA
CAR 92.48 % 86.68 % 92.53 % 16 79.68 %

Benchmark MT rate PT rate ML rate FRAG
CAR 87.85 % 7.85 % 4.31 % 65

Benchmark # Dets # Tracks
CAR 34292 665

This table as LaTeX


This figure as: png pdf

[1] J. Luiten, A. Os̆ep, P. Dendorfer, P. Torr, A. Geiger, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Leibe: HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-object Tracking. IJCV 2020.
[2] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[3] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker