3D Object Detection Evaluation 2017


The 3D object detection benchmark consists of 7481 training images and 7518 test images as well as the corresponding point clouds, comprising a total of 80.256 labeled objects. For evaluation, we compute precision-recall curves. To rank the methods we compute average precision. We require that all methods use the same parameter set for all test pairs. Our development kit provides details about the data format as well as MATLAB / C++ utility functions for reading and writing the label files.

We evaluate 3D object detection performance using the PASCAL criteria also used for 2D object detection. Far objects are thus filtered based on their bounding box height in the image plane. As only objects also appearing on the image plane are labeled, objects in don't car areas do not count as false positives. We note that the evaluation does not take care of ignoring detections that are not visible on the image plane — these detections might give rise to false positives. For cars we require an 3D bounding box overlap of 70%, while for pedestrians and cyclists we require a 3D bounding box overlap of 50%. Difficulties are defined as follows:

  • Easy: Min. bounding box height: 40 Px, Max. occlusion level: Fully visible, Max. truncation: 15 %
  • Moderate: Min. bounding box height: 25 Px, Max. occlusion level: Partly occluded, Max. truncation: 30 %
  • Hard: Min. bounding box height: 25 Px, Max. occlusion level: Difficult to see, Max. truncation: 50 %

All methods are ranked based on the moderately difficult results.

Note 2: On 08.10.2019, we have followed the suggestions of the Mapillary team in their paper Disentangling Monocular 3D Object Detection and use 40 recall positions instead of the 11 recall positions proposed in the original Pascal VOC benchmark. This results in a more fair comparison of the results, please check their paper. The last leaderboards right before this change can be found here: Object Detection Evaluation, 3D Object Detection Evaluation, Bird's Eye View Evaluation.
Important Policy Update: As more and more non-published work and re-implementations of existing work is submitted to KITTI, we have established a new policy: from now on, only submissions with significant novelty that are leading to a peer-reviewed paper in a conference or journal are allowed. Minor modifications of existing algorithms or student research projects are not allowed. Such work must be evaluated on a split of the training set. To ensure that our policy is adopted, new users must detail their status, describe their work and specify the targeted venue during registration. Furthermore, we will regularly delete all entries that are 6 months old but are still anonymous or do not have a paper associated with them. For conferences, 6 month is enough to determine if a paper has been accepted and to add the bibliography information. For longer review cycles, you need to resubmit your results.
Additional information used by the methods
  • Stereo: Method uses left and right (stereo) images
  • Flow: Method uses optical flow (2 temporally adjacent images)
  • Multiview: Method uses more than 2 temporally adjacent images
  • Laser Points: Method uses point clouds from Velodyne laser scanner
  • Additional training data: Use of additional data sources for training (see details)

Car


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 VirConv-S code 87.20 % 92.48 % 82.45 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, S. Shi and C. Wang: Virtual Sparse Convolution for Multimodal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
2 UDeerPEP code 86.72 % 91.77 % 82.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Dong, H. Ji, X. Huang, W. Zhang, X. Zhan and J. Chen: PeP: a Point enhanced Painting method for unified point cloud tasks. 2023.
3 VirConv-T code 86.25 % 92.54 % 81.24 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, S. Shi and C. Wang: Virtual Sparse Convolution for Multimodal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
4 MPCF 85.50 % 92.46 % 80.69 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
5 TSSTDet 85.47 % 91.84 % 80.65 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang, D. Bui and M. Yoo: TSSTDet: Transformation-Based 3-D Object Detection via a Spatial Shape Transformer. IEEE Sensors Journal 2024.
6 3ONet 85.47 % 92.03 % 78.64 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
7 TED code 85.28 % 91.61 % 80.68 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
8 MB3D 85.24 % 91.43 % 80.28 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
9 PVFusion code 85.07 % 90.98 % 80.16 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
10 LoGoNet code 85.06 % 91.80 % 80.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
11 ANM code 84.92 % 91.46 % 81.87 % ANM ANM
12 LVP(84.92) 84.92 % 91.37 % 80.07 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
13 CDF 84.87 % 91.02 % 79.41 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
14 MM-UniMODE 84.81 % 91.23 % 81.44 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
15 SFD code 84.76 % 91.73 % 77.92 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Wu, L. Peng, H. Yang, L. Xie, C. Huang, C. Deng, H. Liu and D. Cai: Sparse Fuse Dense: Towards High Quality 3D Detection with Depth Completion. CVPR 2022.
16 ACFNet 84.67 % 90.80 % 80.14 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
17 FEIF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 84.56 % 91.27 % 80.05 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
18 OGMMDet code 84.51 % 91.82 % 79.80 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
19 HAF-PVP_test 84.50 % 91.53 % 77.85 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
20 Anonymous 84.40 % 91.31 % 80.04 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
21 SSLFusion 84.38 % 91.43 % 80.04 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
22 TED-S Reproduced 84.29 % 91.62 % 80.00 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
23 3D HANet code 84.18 % 90.79 % 77.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Q. Xia, Y. Chen, G. Cai, G. Chen, D. Xie, J. Su and Z. Wang: 3D HANet: A Flexible 3D Heatmap Auxiliary Network for Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2023.
24 CasA++ code 84.04 % 90.68 % 79.69 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
25 TED_S_baseline code 83.99 % 90.75 % 79.63 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
26 L-AUG 83.84 % 90.53 % 79.10 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
27 MLFusion-VS 83.71 % 91.12 % 79.74 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
28 HS-fusion 83.42 % 89.12 % 78.60 % - s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
29 URFormer 83.40 % 89.64 % 78.62 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
30 SFA-GCL code 83.32 % 92.12 % 78.07 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
31 LFT 83.32 % 91.80 % 78.29 % 0.1s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
32 SFA-GCL(80) code 83.29 % 91.96 % 78.05 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
33 MSIT-Det 83.27 % 92.11 % 73.81 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
34 GraR-VoI code 83.27 % 91.89 % 77.78 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
35 GLENet-VR code 83.23 % 91.67 % 78.43 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhu, J. Hou and Y. Yuan: GLENet: Boosting 3D object detectors with generative label uncertainty estimation. International Journal of Computer Vision 2023.
Y. Zhang, J. Hou and Y. Yuan: A Comprehensive Study of the Robustness for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectors against Adversarial Attacks. International Journal of Computer Vision 2023.
36 VPFNet code 83.21 % 91.02 % 78.20 % 0.06 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhu, J. Deng, Y. Zhang, J. Ji, Q. Mao, H. Li and Y. Zhang: VPFNet: Improving 3D Object Detection with Virtual Point based LiDAR and Stereo Data Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2022.
37 GraR-Po code 83.18 % 91.79 % 77.98 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
38 CasA code 83.06 % 91.58 % 80.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
39 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 83.05 % 91.91 % 77.84 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
40 UPIDet code 82.97 % 89.13 % 80.05 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
41 Anonymous code 82.93 % 91.31 % 78.00 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
42 ECA 82.90 % 88.58 % 78.57 % 0.08 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
43 MLF-DET 82.89 % 91.18 % 77.89 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
44 BtcDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.86 % 90.64 % 78.09 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhong and U. Neumann: Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
45 VPA 82.78 % 91.62 % 77.97 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
46 GraR-Vo code 82.77 % 91.29 % 77.20 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
47 SPG_mini
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.66 % 90.64 % 77.91 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
48 OcTr 82.64 % 90.88 % 77.77 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
C. Zhou, Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: OcTr: Octree-based Transformer for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
49 MAK_VOXEL_RCNN 82.62 % 91.29 % 77.93 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
50 DiffCandiDet 82.59 % 91.18 % 77.64 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
51 PA3DNet 82.57 % 90.49 % 77.88 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Wang, L. Zhao and Y. Yue: PA3DNet: 3-D Vehicle Detection with Pseudo Shape Segmentation and Adaptive Camera- LiDAR Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2023.
52 SE-SSD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.54 % 91.49 % 77.15 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
W. Zheng, W. Tang, L. Jiang and C. Fu: SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloud. CVPR 2021.
53 IIOU code 82.51 % 88.83 % 75.82 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
54 MAK code 82.50 % 88.97 % 77.81 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
55 DVF-V 82.45 % 89.40 % 77.56 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Mahmoud, J. Hu and S. Waslander: Dense Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
56 GraR-Pi code 82.42 % 90.94 % 77.00 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
57 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 82.40 % 91.57 % 75.45 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
58 DVF-PV 82.40 % 90.99 % 77.37 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Mahmoud, J. Hu and S. Waslander: Dense Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
59 3D Dual-Fusion code 82.40 % 91.01 % 79.39 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Kim, K. Park, M. Kim, D. Kum and J. Choi: 3D Dual-Fusion: Dual-Domain Dual-Query Camera-LiDAR Fusion for 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13529 2022.
60 SFA-GCL code 82.38 % 91.56 % 75.41 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
61 SCNet3D 82.35 % 89.16 % 77.72 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
62 HDet3D 82.33 % 89.93 % 77.20 % 0.07 s >8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
63 RDIoU code 82.30 % 90.65 % 77.26 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Sheng, S. Cai, N. Zhao, B. Deng, J. Huang, X. Hua, M. Zhao and G. Lee: Rethinking IoU-based Optimization for Single- stage 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
64 PVT-SSD 82.29 % 90.65 % 76.85 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, W. Wang, M. Chen, B. Lin, T. He, H. Chen, X. He and W. Ouyang: PVT-SSD: Single-Stage 3D Object Detector with Point-Voxel Transformer. CVPR 2023.
65 Focals Conv code 82.28 % 90.55 % 77.59 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, Y. Li, X. Zhang, J. Sun and J. Jia: Focal Sparse Convolutional Networks for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
66 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 82.28 % 89.57 % 75.35 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
67 CLOCs code 82.28 % 89.16 % 77.23 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection . 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
68 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 82.23 % 90.90 % 79.67 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
69 DEF-Model 82.19 % 88.49 % 77.40 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
70 spark 82.18 % 90.66 % 77.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
71 DGEnhCL code 82.18 % 91.12 % 75.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
72 SASA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.16 % 88.76 % 77.16 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
C. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Zhang and D. Tao: SASA: Semantics-Augmented Set Abstraction for Point-based 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01976 2022.
73 spark_voxel_rcnn code 82.15 % 90.62 % 77.40 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
74 PG-RCNN code 82.13 % 89.38 % 77.33 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
75 SPG
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.13 % 90.50 % 78.90 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
76 SDGUFusion 82.12 % 91.03 % 77.67 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
77 voxel_spark code 82.10 % 90.47 % 79.01 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
78 VoTr-TSD code 82.09 % 89.90 % 79.14 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Mao, Y. Xue, M. Niu, H. Bai, J. Feng, X. Liang, H. Xu and C. Xu: Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
79 Voxel_Spark_focal_we code 82.08 % 90.65 % 77.36 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
80 Pyramid R-CNN 82.08 % 88.39 % 77.49 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Mao, M. Niu, H. Bai, X. Liang, H. Xu and C. Xu: Pyramid R-CNN: Towards Better Performance and Adaptability for 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
81 VoxSeT code 82.06 % 88.53 % 77.46 % 33 ms 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, R. Li, S. Li and L. Zhang: Voxel Set Transformer: A Set-to-Set Approach to 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
82 c2f 82.05 % 89.69 % 79.05 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
83 DDF 82.03 % 89.69 % 79.47 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
84 LGNet-Car code 82.02 % 90.65 % 77.34 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
85 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 82.02 % 90.88 % 77.37 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
86 EQ-PVRCNN code 82.01 % 90.13 % 77.53 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
87 BPG3D 81.98 % 90.52 % 78.97 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
88 voxel-rcnn+++ code 81.97 % 90.59 % 77.13 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
89 EPNet++ 81.96 % 91.37 % 76.71 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
90 USVLab BSAODet code 81.95 % 88.66 % 77.40 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
91 NIV-SSD 81.95 % 90.98 % 76.83 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
92 Spark_partA22 81.94 % 90.24 % 76.95 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
93 HMFI code 81.93 % 88.90 % 77.30 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
94 focalnet 81.92 % 90.59 % 79.25 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
95 focalnet 81.92 % 90.57 % 79.24 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
96 RagNet3D code 81.91 % 88.74 % 77.45 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
97 AMVFNet code 81.90 % 90.52 % 77.42 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
98 spark2 81.88 % 88.61 % 77.19 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
99 PDV code 81.86 % 90.43 % 77.36 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
100 SQD 81.82 % 91.58 % 79.07 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
101 Spark_PartA2_Soft_fo code 81.82 % 90.10 % 78.35 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
102 af 81.78 % 90.46 % 77.37 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
103 CityBrainLab-CT3D code 81.77 % 87.83 % 77.16 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Sheng, S. Cai, Y. Liu, B. Deng, J. Huang, X. Hua and M. Zhao: Improving 3D Object Detection with Channel- wise Transformer. ICCV 2021.
104 M3DeTR code 81.73 % 90.28 % 76.96 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
105 SIENet code 81.71 % 88.22 % 77.22 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Y. Yao, Z. Quan, W. Yang and J. Xie: SIENet: Spatial Information Enhancement Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud. 2021.
106 FIRM-Net 81.65 % 88.25 % 76.98 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
107 Voxel R-CNN code 81.62 % 90.90 % 77.06 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, S. Shi, P. Li, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detection . AAAI 2021.
108 BADet code 81.61 % 89.28 % 76.58 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
R. Qian, X. Lai and X. Li: BADet: Boundary-Aware 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. Pattern Recognition 2022.
109 FromVoxelToPoint code 81.58 % 88.53 % 77.37 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
110 LGNet-3classes code 81.57 % 90.84 % 76.98 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
111 H^23D R-CNN code 81.55 % 90.43 % 77.22 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: From Multi-View to Hollow-3D: Hallucinated Hollow-3D R-CNN for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2021.
112 test 81.55 % 88.47 % 76.51 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
113 FARP-Net code 81.53 % 88.36 % 78.98 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
T. Xie, L. Wang, K. Wang, R. Li, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Yang, H. Liu and J. Li: FARP-Net: Local-Global Feature Aggregation and Relation-Aware Proposals for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2023.
114 VoxelFSD 81.50 % 89.89 % 76.82 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
115 PR-SSD 81.49 % 89.69 % 76.71 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
116 spark-part2 81.49 % 89.82 % 76.76 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
117 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 81.46 % 88.25 % 76.96 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
118 focal 81.45 % 90.73 % 77.13 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
119 P2V-RCNN 81.45 % 88.34 % 77.20 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
120 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 81.43 % 90.25 % 76.82 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
121 CZY_PPF_Net 81.39 % 90.44 % 77.02 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
122 XView 81.35 % 89.21 % 76.87 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
123 GeVo 81.35 % 89.66 % 76.82 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
124 RangeRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 81.33 % 88.47 % 77.09 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, M. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeRCNN: Towards Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection with Range Image Representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00206 2020.
125 CAT-Det 81.32 % 89.87 % 76.68 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
126 PV-RCNN-Plus 81.29 % 87.72 % 76.78 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
127 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 81.28 % 87.65 % 76.79 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
128 SP_SECOND_IOU code 81.25 % 89.50 % 76.69 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
129 GF-pointnet 81.23 % 88.23 % 76.53 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
130 MFB3D 81.11 % 90.57 % 76.62 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
131 HA-PillarNet 81.06 % 89.65 % 76.67 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
132 U_PV_V2_ep_100_100 80.97 % 87.41 % 76.58 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
133 VPFNet code 80.97 % 88.51 % 76.74 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
134 CG-SSD 80.97 % 87.87 % 76.54 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
135 RBEV-Voxel code 80.87 % 87.15 % 76.28 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
136 Sem-Aug
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 80.77 % 89.41 % 75.90 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Zhao, M. Wang and Y. Yue: Sem-Aug: Improving Camera-LiDAR Feature Fusion With Semantic Augmentation for 3D Vehicle Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
137 StructuralIF 80.69 % 87.15 % 76.26 % 0.02 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Pei An: Deep structural information fusion for 3D object detection on LiDAR-camera system. Accepted in CVIU 2021.
138 CLOCs_PVCas code 80.67 % 88.94 % 77.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection . 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
139 SVGA-Net 80.47 % 87.33 % 75.91 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
140 KPTr 80.40 % 88.52 % 75.28 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
141 SRDL 80.38 % 87.73 % 76.27 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
142 Fast-CLOCs 80.35 % 89.10 % 76.99 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
143 SPANet 80.34 % 91.05 % 74.89 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Ye: SPANet: Spatial and Part-Aware Aggregation Network for 3D Object Detection. Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021.
144 IA-SSD (single) code 80.32 % 88.87 % 75.10 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
145 GSG-FPS code 80.29 % 88.56 % 75.16 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
146 CIA-SSD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 80.28 % 89.59 % 72.87 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
W. Zheng, W. Tang, S. Chen, L. Jiang and C. Fu: CIA-SSD: Confident IoU-Aware Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloud. AAAI 2021.
147 Test_dif code 80.17 % 88.68 % 75.12 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
148 IA-SSD (multi) code 80.13 % 88.34 % 75.04 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
149 EBM3DOD code 80.12 % 91.05 % 72.78 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson, M. Danelljan and T. Schön: Accurate 3D Object Detection using Energy- Based Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04634 2020.
150 3D-CVF at SPA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 80.05 % 89.20 % 73.11 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Yoo, Y. Kim, J. Kim and J. Choi: 3D-CVF: Generating Joint Camera and LiDAR Features Using Cross-View Spatial Feature Fusion for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2020.
151 IOUFusion 80.00 % 87.72 % 75.00 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
152 bs 79.95 % 90.52 % 76.86 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
153 spark_second code 79.93 % 86.66 % 74.93 % . s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
154 SIF 79.88 % 86.84 % 75.89 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
155 spark_second_focal_w 79.81 % 86.41 % 75.03 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
156 RAFDet 79.81 % 88.24 % 75.06 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
157 RangeIoUDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 79.80 % 88.60 % 76.76 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, Z. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeIoUDet: Range Image Based Real-Time 3D Object Detector Optimized by Intersection Over Union. CVPR 2021.
158 SA-SSD code 79.79 % 88.75 % 74.16 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. He, H. Zeng, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Structure Aware Single-stage 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
159 MMAE
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 79.75 % 88.07 % 74.41 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
160 STD code 79.71 % 87.95 % 75.09 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
161 OFFNet 79.68 % 85.81 % 75.41 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
162 MGAF-3DSSD code 79.68 % 88.16 % 72.39 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
163 RAFDet 79.66 % 88.17 % 74.75 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
164 Struc info fusion II 79.59 % 88.97 % 72.51 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. An, J. Liang, J. Ma, K. Yu and B. Fang: Struc info fusion. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
165 3DSSD code 79.57 % 88.36 % 74.55 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
166 EBM3DOD baseline code 79.52 % 88.80 % 72.30 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson, M. Danelljan and T. Schön: Accurate 3D Object Detection using Energy- Based Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04634 2020.
167 Struc info fusion I 79.49 % 88.70 % 74.25 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. An, J. Liang, J. Ma, K. Yu and B. Fang: Struc info fusion. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
168 PartA2_basline code 79.48 % 88.66 % 76.67 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
169 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 79.47 % 88.33 % 72.29 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
170 spark_second2 79.45 % 86.28 % 74.71 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
171 sec_spark code 79.44 % 86.08 % 74.70 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
172 RAFDet code 79.41 % 87.40 % 74.61 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
173 DFAF3D 79.37 % 88.59 % 72.21 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
174 SSL-PointGNN code 79.36 % 87.78 % 74.15 % 0.56 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
E. Erçelik, E. Yurtsever, M. Liu, Z. Yang, H. Zhang, P. Topçam, M. Listl, Y. Çaylı and A. Knoll: 3D Object Detection with a Self-supervised Lidar Scene Flow Backbone. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00705 2022.
175 PUDet 79.34 % 87.85 % 74.58 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
176 EPNet code 79.28 % 89.81 % 74.59 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
T. Huang, Z. Liu, X. Chen and X. Bai: EPNet: Enhancing Point Features with Image Semantics for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2020.
177 second_iou_baseline code 79.20 % 88.08 % 75.91 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
178 DVFENet 79.18 % 86.20 % 74.58 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
179 AAMVFNet code 79.09 % 88.01 % 76.43 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
180 second_iou_baseline 79.05 % 87.81 % 75.81 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
181 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 79.05 % 87.45 % 76.14 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
182 GD-MAE 79.03 % 88.14 % 73.55 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, T. He, J. Liu, H. Chen, B. Wu, B. Lin, X. He and W. Ouyang: GD-MAE: Generative Decoder for MAE Pre- training on LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2023.
183 3D IoU-Net 79.03 % 87.96 % 72.78 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, S. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: 3D IoU-Net: IoU Guided 3D Object Detector for Point Clouds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04962 2020.
184 SERCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 78.96 % 87.74 % 74.30 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Zhou, J. Fang, X. Song, L. Liu, J. Yin, Y. Dai, H. Li and R. Yang: Joint 3D Instance Segmentation and Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2020.
185 Second_baseline code 78.94 % 85.85 % 74.28 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
186 ACDet code 78.85 % 88.47 % 73.86 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
187 MG 78.72 % 87.68 % 72.00 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
188 MVAF-Net code 78.71 % 87.87 % 75.48 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
G. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Cao and J. Wu: Multi-View Adaptive Fusion Network for 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00652 2020.
189 Res3DNet 78.54 % 87.22 % 74.36 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
190 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 78.49 % 87.81 % 73.51 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
191 CLOCs_SecCas 78.45 % 86.38 % 72.45 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
192 Patches - EMP
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 78.41 % 89.84 % 73.15 % 0.5 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Lehner, A. Mitterecker, T. Adler, M. Hofmarcher, B. Nessler and S. Hochreiter: Patch Refinement: Localized 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04093 2019.
193 HotSpotNet 78.31 % 87.60 % 73.34 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
194 Sem-Aug-PointRCNN++ 78.06 % 86.69 % 73.85 % 0.1 s 8 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Zhao, M. Wang and Y. Yue: Sem-Aug: Improving Camera-LiDAR Feature Fusion With Semantic Augmentation for 3D Vehicle Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
195 CenterNet3D 77.90 % 86.20 % 73.03 % 0.04 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Ai, T. Xu, L. Chen and D. Cao: CenterNet3D:An Anchor free Object Detector for Autonomous Driving. 2020.
196 spark_pointpillar code 77.82 % 87.59 % 73.94 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
197 pointpillars_spark code 77.75 % 87.55 % 73.63 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
198 VoxelFSD-S 77.67 % 86.29 % 72.18 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
199 pointpillar_spark_fo 77.66 % 85.99 % 72.51 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
200 spark_pointpillar2 77.57 % 85.96 % 72.29 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
201 SC-SSD 77.52 % 85.51 % 74.02 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
202 U_second_v4_ep_100_8 77.45 % 85.20 % 73.84 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
203 UberATG-MMF
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 77.43 % 88.40 % 70.22 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Liang*, B. Yang*, Y. Chen, R. Hu and R. Urtasun: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2019.
204 Associate-3Ddet code 77.40 % 85.99 % 70.53 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Du, X. Ye, X. Tan, J. Feng, Z. Xu, E. Ding and S. Wen: Associate-3Ddet: Perceptual-to-Conceptual Association for 3D Point Cloud Object Detection. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
205 Fast Point R-CNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 77.40 % 85.29 % 70.24 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: Fast Point R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV) 2019.
206 RangeDet (Official) code 77.36 % 85.41 % 72.60 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Fan, X. Xiong, F. Wang, N. Wang and Z. Zhang: RangeDet: In Defense of Range View for LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
207 Patches
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 77.20 % 88.67 % 71.82 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz
J. Lehner, A. Mitterecker, T. Adler, M. Hofmarcher, B. Nessler and S. Hochreiter: Patch Refinement: Localized 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04093 2019.
208 SeSame-point code 76.83 % 85.25 % 71.60 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
209 HRI-VoxelFPN 76.70 % 85.64 % 69.44 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Kuang, B. Wang, J. An, M. Zhang and Z. Zhang: Voxel-FPN:multi-scale voxel feature aggregation in 3D object detection from point clouds. sensors 2020.
210 SARPNET 76.64 % 85.63 % 71.31 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, H. Chen, C. Zhang, X. Hao and Z. Zhang: SARPNET: Shape Attention Regional Proposal Network for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2019.
211 IIOU_LDR code 76.51 % 86.95 % 71.53 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
212 3D IoU Loss
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 76.50 % 86.16 % 71.39 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
D. Zhou, J. Fang, X. Song, C. Guan, J. Yin, Y. Dai and R. Yang: IoU Loss for 2D/3D Object Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) 2019.
213 TF-PartA2 76.39 % 86.65 % 71.67 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
214 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 76.39 % 87.36 % 66.69 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
215 pointpillar_baseline code 76.37 % 85.29 % 71.03 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
216 ROT_S3D 76.35 % 86.56 % 71.51 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
217 BAPartA2S-4h 76.31 % 86.97 % 73.03 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
218 VSAC 76.29 % 85.06 % 71.65 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
219 LVFSD 76.14 % 84.18 % 71.55 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
220 SegVoxelNet 76.13 % 86.04 % 70.76 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yi, S. Shi, M. Ding, J. Sun, K. Xu, H. Zhou, Z. Wang, S. Li and G. Wang: SegVoxelNet: Exploring Semantic Context and Depth-aware Features for 3D Vehicle Detection from Point Cloud. ICRA 2020.
221 centerpoint_pcdet 76.12 % 83.47 % 71.17 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
222 mm3d_PartA2 76.09 % 86.82 % 72.74 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
223 S-AT GCN 76.04 % 83.20 % 71.17 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
224 prcnn_v18_80_100 76.03 % 84.37 % 71.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
225 TANet code 75.94 % 84.39 % 68.82 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
226 MMpointpillars 75.75 % 85.86 % 70.65 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
227 SFEBEV 75.74 % 86.08 % 70.59 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
228 PointRGCN 75.73 % 85.97 % 70.60 % 0.26 s GPU @ V100 (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
229 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 75.64 % 86.96 % 70.70 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
230 voxelnext_pcdet 75.58 % 83.88 % 70.77 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
231 MEDL-U 75.56 % 85.43 % 68.79 % 1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
232 XT-PartA2 75.56 % 85.54 % 71.02 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
233 SecAtten 75.50 % 85.55 % 70.46 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
234 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 75.43 % 86.10 % 68.88 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
235 CAT2 75.33 % 84.84 % 70.07 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
236 R-GCN 75.26 % 83.42 % 68.73 % 0.16 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
237 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 75.15 % 85.00 % 69.84 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
238 SeSame-voxel code 75.05 % 81.51 % 70.53 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
239 MAFF-Net(DAF-Pillar) 75.04 % 85.52 % 67.61 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Zhang, Z. Liang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao, Y. Ming, T. Wenming and S. Pu: MAFF-Net: Filter False Positive for 3D Vehicle Detection with Multi-modal Adaptive Feature Fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10945 2020.
240 PASS-PointPillar 74.85 % 84.72 % 69.05 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
241 PI-RCNN 74.82 % 84.37 % 70.03 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Xie, C. Xiang, Z. Yu, G. Xu, Z. Yang, D. Cai and X. He: PI-RCNN: An Efficient Multi-sensor 3D Object Detector with Point-based Attentive Cont-conv Fusion Module. AAAI 2020 : The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020.
242 P2P code 74.76 % 85.47 % 67.96 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
243 WA 74.59 % 84.80 % 67.27 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
244 mmFUSION code 74.38 % 85.24 % 69.43 % 1s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ahmad and A. Del Bue: mmFUSION: Multimodal Fusion for 3D Objects Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04058 2023.
245 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 74.31 % 82.58 % 68.99 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
246 HINTED 74.13 % 84.00 % 67.03 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
247 ARPNET 74.04 % 84.69 % 68.64 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
248 Harmonic PointPillar code 73.96 % 82.26 % 69.21 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, J. Mekala, Z. Nain, J. Park and H. Jung: 3D Harmonic Loss: Towards Task-consistent and Time-friendly 3D Object Detection for V2X Orchestration. will submit to IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2022.
249 SeSame-pillar code 73.85 % 83.88 % 68.65 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
250 PC-CNN-V2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 73.79 % 85.57 % 65.65 % 0.5 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Matlab + C/C++)
X. Du, M. Ang, S. Karaman and D. Rus: A General Pipeline for 3D Detection of Vehicles. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018.
251 C-GCN 73.62 % 83.49 % 67.01 % 0.147 s GPU @ V100 (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
252 PCNet3D 73.58 % 83.22 % 68.19 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
253 3DBN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 73.53 % 83.77 % 66.23 % 0.13s 1080Ti (Python+C/C++)
X. Li, J. Guivant, N. Kwok and Y. Xu: 3D Backbone Network for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2019.
254 PointRGBNet 73.49 % 83.99 % 68.56 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
255 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 73.17 % 83.34 % 67.93 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
256 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 73.15 % 82.32 % 66.64 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
257 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 72.93 % 81.11 % 67.24 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
258 MM_SECOND code 72.68 % 82.02 % 66.27 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
259 DASS 72.31 % 81.85 % 65.99 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
O. Unal, L. Van Gool and D. Dai: Improving Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation by Learning 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2021.
260 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 71.76 % 83.07 % 65.73 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
261 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 71.70 % 82.11 % 67.08 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
262 PI-SECOND code 71.46 % 81.62 % 66.26 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
263 AEPF 71.22 % 81.43 % 66.58 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
264 ODGS 70.85 % 78.39 % 64.81 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
265 WS3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 70.59 % 80.99 % 64.23 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Meng, W. Wang, T. Zhou, J. Shen, L. Van Gool and D. Dai: Weakly Supervised 3D Object Detection from Lidar Point Cloud. 2020.
266 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 69.79 % 82.19 % 60.59 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
267 EOTL code 69.13 % 79.97 % 58.57 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
268 UberATG-ContFuse
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 68.78 % 83.68 % 61.67 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Liang, B. Yang, S. Wang and R. Urtasun: Deep Continuous Fusion for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2018.
269 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 67.76 % 77.24 % 62.05 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
270 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 67.37 % 83.21 % 59.91 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
271 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 67.33 % 77.55 % 62.44 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
272 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 66.47 % 76.39 % 60.23 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
273 StereoDistill 66.39 % 81.66 % 57.39 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
274 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 64.66 % 81.39 % 57.22 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
275 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 64.04 % 76.15 % 59.79 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
276 MV3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 63.63 % 74.97 % 54.00 % 0.36 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li and T. Xia: Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2017.
277 SNVC
This method uses stereo information.
 code 61.34 % 78.54 % 54.23 % 1 s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
S. Li, Z. Liu, Z. Shen and K. Cheng: Stereo Neural Vernier Caliper. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
278 RCD 60.56 % 70.54 % 55.58 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Bewley, P. Sun, T. Mensink, D. Anguelov and C. Sminchisescu: Range Conditioned Dilated Convolutions for Scale Invariant 3D Object Detection. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2020.
279 SeSame-point w/score code 56.92 % 74.30 % 48.14 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
280 A3DODWTDA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 56.82 % 62.84 % 48.12 % 0.08 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson and E. Linder-Norén: Automotive 3D Object Detection Without Target Domain Annotations. 2018.
281 PL++ (SDN+GDC)
This method uses stereo information.
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 54.88 % 68.38 % 49.16 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. You, Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, G. Pleiss, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. International Conference on Learning Representations 2020.
282 MV3D (LIDAR)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 54.54 % 68.35 % 49.16 % 0.24 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li and T. Xia: Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2017.
283 CDN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 54.22 % 74.52 % 46.36 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Garg, Y. Wang, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, K. Weinberger and W. Chao: Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2020.
284 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 53.58 % 74.39 % 46.50 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
285 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 52.18 % 73.50 % 45.14 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
286 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 51.85 % 70.14 % 50.03 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
287 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 47.34 % 55.93 % 42.60 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
288 SeSame-voxel w/score code 47.14 % 61.57 % 41.06 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
289 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 46.39 % 65.80 % 38.42 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
290 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 45.78 % 68.21 % 37.73 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
291 CDN-PL++
This method uses stereo information.
 44.86 % 64.31 % 38.11 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Garg, Y. Wang, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, K. Weinberger and W. Chao: Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2020.
292 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 43.27 % 67.02 % 36.43 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
293 Pseudo-LiDAR++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 42.43 % 61.11 % 36.99 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. You, Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, G. Pleiss, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. International Conference on Learning Representations 2020.
294 YOLOStereo3D
This method uses stereo information.
 code 41.25 % 65.68 % 30.42 % 0.1 s GPU 1080Ti
Y. Liu, L. Wang and M. Liu: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
295 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 38.76 % 45.79 % 30.00 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
296 ZoomNet
This method uses stereo information.
 code 38.64 % 55.98 % 30.97 % 0.3 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Z. Xu: ZoomNet: Part-Aware Adaptive Zooming Neural Network for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020.
297 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 37.60 % 55.15 % 30.25 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
298 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 35.49 % 57.02 % 31.03 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
299 BKDStereo3D code 35.23 % 59.38 % 25.24 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
300 Pseudo-Lidar
This method uses stereo information.
 code 34.05 % 54.53 % 28.25 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
301 BKDStereo3D w/o KD code 32.08 % 56.72 % 23.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
302 Stereo CenterNet
This method uses stereo information.
 31.30 % 49.94 % 25.62 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi, Y. Guo, Z. Mi and X. Li: Stereo CenterNet-based 3D object detection for autonomous driving. Neurocomputing 2022.
303 Stereo R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 30.23 % 47.58 % 23.72 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. Li, X. Chen and S. Shen: Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2019.
304 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 27.26 % 40.99 % 25.32 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
305 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 26.80 % 34.72 % 23.05 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
306 CIE + DM3D 25.02 % 35.96 % 21.47 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Ananimities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
307 monodetrnext-a 24.14 % 29.94 % 23.79 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
308 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 23.28 % 29.90 % 18.96 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
309 error 23.07 % 39.40 % 19.52 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
310 DA3D+KM3D code 22.08 % 30.83 % 19.20 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
311 MonoTRKDv2 21.87 % 30.26 % 18.87 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
312 monodetrnext-f 21.69 % 27.21 % 21.16 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
313 MonoTAKD V2 21.26 % 29.86 % 18.27 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
314 CIE 20.95 % 31.55 % 17.83 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
315 DA3D 20.47 % 27.76 % 17.89 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
316 Sample code 19.49 % 25.75 % 15.70 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
317 MonoLTKD 19.43 % 27.91 % 16.51 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
318 MonoLTKD_V3 19.42 % 27.91 % 16.51 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
319 MonoTAKD 19.42 % 27.91 % 16.51 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
320 MonoLSS 19.15 % 26.11 % 16.94 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
321 RT3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 19.14 % 23.74 % 18.86 % 0.09 s GPU @ 1.8Ghz
Y. Zeng, Y. Hu, S. Liu, J. Ye, Y. Han, X. Li and N. Sun: RT3D: Real-Time 3-D Vehicle Detection in LiDAR Point Cloud for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2018.
322 NeurOCS 18.94 % 29.89 % 15.90 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Min, B. Zhuang, S. Schulter, B. Liu, E. Dunn and M. Chandraker: NeurOCS: Neural NOCS Supervision for Monocular 3D Object Localization. CVPR 2023.
323 MonoLiG code 18.86 % 24.90 % 16.79 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
324 CMKD code 18.69 % 28.55 % 16.77 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
325 MonoAux-v2 code 18.55 % 26.00 % 15.79 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
326 Mix-Teaching code 18.54 % 26.89 % 15.79 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
327 StereoFENet
This method uses stereo information.
 18.41 % 29.14 % 14.20 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Bao, B. Xu and Z. Chen: MonoFENet: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Feature Enhancement Networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2019.
328 Occlude3D code 18.20 % 23.71 % 15.18 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
329 Anonymous 18.19 % 25.48 % 14.27 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
330 SHUD 18.18 % 28.41 % 15.11 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
331 PS-SVDM 18.13 % 29.22 % 15.35 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
332 MonoSample (DID-M3D) code 18.05 % 28.63 % 15.19 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
333 TBD 17.97 % 28.50 % 15.03 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
334 LPCG-Monoflex code 17.80 % 25.56 % 15.38 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
335 PS-fld code 17.74 % 23.74 % 15.14 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
336 MonoSKD code 17.35 % 28.43 % 15.01 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Wang and J. Zheng: MonoSKD: General Distillation Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection via Spearman Correlation Coefficient. ECAI 2023.
337 MonoSTL 17.14 % 24.54 % 14.59 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
338 MonoDDE 17.14 % 24.93 % 15.10 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
339 MonoCDiT 17.13 % 23.52 % 14.37 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
340 MonoNeRD code 17.13 % 22.75 % 15.63 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
341 OPA-3D code 17.05 % 24.60 % 14.25 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
342 Mobile Stereo R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 17.04 % 26.97 % 13.26 % 1.8 s NVIDIA Jetson TX2
M. Hussein, M. Khalil and B. Abdullah: 3D Object Detection using Mobile Stereo R- CNN on Nvidia Jetson TX2. International Conference on Advanced Engineering, Technology and Applications (ICAETA) 2021.
343 DD3D code 16.87 % 23.19 % 14.36 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
344 ADD code 16.81 % 25.61 % 13.79 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wu, Y. Wu, J. Pu, X. Li and X. Wang: Attention-based Depth Distillation with 3D-Aware Positional Encoding for Monocular 3D Object Detection. AAAI2023 .
345 MonoSGC 16.77 % 27.01 % 14.61 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
346 MonoUNI code 16.73 % 24.75 % 13.49 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
347 MonoCD code 16.59 % 25.53 % 14.53 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Yan, P. Yan, S. Xiong, X. Xiang and Y. Tan: MonoCD: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Complementary Depths. CVPR 2024.
348 FDGNet code 16.53 % 27.22 % 13.52 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
349 MSFENet code 16.49 % 26.30 % 13.55 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
350 BA2-Det+MonoFlex 16.30 % 23.45 % 13.50 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
351 DID-M3D code 16.29 % 24.40 % 13.75 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Peng, X. Wu, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: DID-M3D: Decoupling Instance Depth for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
352 MonoDETR code 16.26 % 24.52 % 13.93 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
R. Zhang, H. Qiu, T. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Guo, Y. Qiao, P. Gao and H. Li: MonoDETR: Depth-aware Transformer for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13310 2022.
353 MonoFRD 16.24 % 21.11 % 14.97 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
354 DCD code 15.90 % 23.81 % 13.21 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Li, Y. Chen, J. He and Z. Zhang: Densely Constrained Depth Estimator for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision 2022.
355 MonoDTR 15.39 % 21.99 % 12.73 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
356 GUPNet code 15.02 % 22.26 % 13.12 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
357 Cube R-CNN code 15.01 % 23.59 % 12.56 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
358 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 14.94 % 21.75 % 13.07 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
359 MonoSIM_v2 14.74 % 21.69 % 13.08 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
360 SGM3D code 14.65 % 22.46 % 12.97 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
361 MDSNet 14.46 % 24.30 % 11.12 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
362 DEVIANT code 14.46 % 21.88 % 11.89 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
363 DLE code 14.33 % 24.23 % 10.30 % 0.06 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
C. Liu, S. Gu, L. Gool and R. Timofte: Deep Line Encoding for Monocular 3D Object Detection and Depth Prediction. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) 2021.
364 AutoShape code 14.17 % 22.47 % 11.36 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Liu, D. Zhou, F. Lu, J. Fang and L. Zhang: AutoShape: Real-Time Shape-Aware Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
365 MonoDSSMs-M 14.15 % 19.80 % 11.56 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
366 MonoFlex 13.89 % 19.94 % 12.07 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
367 MonoEF 13.87 % 21.29 % 11.71 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
368 MonoRCNN++ code 13.72 % 20.08 % 11.34 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
369 MonoSIM 13.72 % 20.24 % 12.29 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
370 DFR-Net 13.63 % 19.40 % 10.35 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
371 PS-SVDM 13.49 % 20.83 % 11.18 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
372 CaDDN code 13.41 % 19.17 % 11.46 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
373 PCT code 13.37 % 21.00 % 11.31 % 0.045 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Z. Zhang, T. He, M. Li and X. Xue: Progressive Coordinate Transforms for Monocular 3D Object Detection. NeurIPS 2021.
374 Ground-Aware code 13.25 % 21.65 % 9.91 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Liu, Y. Yuan and M. Liu: Ground-aware Monocular 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2021.
375 FMF-occlusion-net 13.12 % 20.28 % 9.56 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
376 Aug3D-RPN 12.99 % 17.82 % 9.78 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
377 HomoLoss(imvoxelnet) code 12.99 % 20.10 % 10.50 % 0.20 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homogrpahy Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
378 DDMP-3D 12.78 % 19.71 % 9.80 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
379 mdab 12.74 % 18.62 % 11.10 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
380 Kinematic3D code 12.72 % 19.07 % 9.17 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 1.5 Ghz (C/C++)
G. Brazil, G. Pons-Moll, X. Liu and B. Schiele: Kinematic 3D Object Detection in Monocular Video. ECCV 2020 .
381 MonoRCNN code 12.65 % 18.36 % 10.03 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Q. Ye, X. Chen, C. Chen, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Geometry-based Distance Decomposition for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
382 GrooMeD-NMS code 12.32 % 18.10 % 9.65 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil and X. Liu: GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
383 MonoRUn code 12.30 % 19.65 % 10.58 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
384 monodle code 12.26 % 17.23 % 10.29 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
385 YoloMono3D code 12.06 % 18.28 % 8.42 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Liu, L. Wang and L. Ming: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
386 IAFA 12.01 % 17.81 % 10.61 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Zhou, X. Song, Y. Dai, J. Yin, F. Lu, M. Liao, J. Fang and L. Zhang: IAFA: Instance-Aware Feature Aggregation for 3D Object Detection from a Single Image. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision 2020.
387 MonOAPC 12.00 % 18.77 % 9.75 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
388 GAC3D 12.00 % 17.75 % 9.15 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Bui, D. Ngo, H. Pham and D. Nguyen: GAC3D: improving monocular 3D object detection with ground-guide model and adaptive convolution. 2021.
389 CMAN 11.87 % 17.77 % 9.16 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
390 PGD-FCOS3D code 11.76 % 19.05 % 9.39 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
391 D4LCN code 11.72 % 16.65 % 9.51 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
392 KM3D code 11.45 % 16.73 % 9.92 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. Li: Monocular 3D Detection with Geometric Constraints Embedding and Semi-supervised Training. 2020.
393 RefinedMPL 11.14 % 18.09 % 8.94 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
394 PatchNet code 11.12 % 15.68 % 10.17 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Ma, S. Liu, Z. Xia, H. Zhang, X. Zeng and W. Ouyang: Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
395 MonoAIU 11.02 % 15.73 % 8.82 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
396 ImVoxelNet code 10.97 % 17.15 % 9.15 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Rukhovich, A. Vorontsova and A. Konushin: ImVoxelNet: Image to Voxels Projection for Monocular and Multi-View General-Purpose 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01178 2021.
397 AM3D 10.74 % 16.50 % 9.52 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Ma, Z. Wang, H. Li, P. Zhang, W. Ouyang and X. Fan: Accurate Monocular Object Detection via Color- Embedded 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE international Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019.
398 RTM3D code 10.34 % 14.41 % 8.77 % 0.05 s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
P. Li, H. Zhao, P. Liu and F. Cao: RTM3D: Real-time Monocular 3D Detection from Object Keypoints for Autonomous Driving. 2020.
399 MonoPair 9.99 % 13.04 % 8.65 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
400 mdab 9.99 % 14.70 % 8.65 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
401 Neighbor-Vote 9.90 % 15.57 % 8.89 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Chu, J. Deng, Y. Li, Z. Yuan, Y. Zhang, J. Ji and Y. Zhang: Neighbor-Vote: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection through Neighbor Distance Voting. ACM MM 2021.
402 SMOKE code 9.76 % 14.03 % 7.84 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, Z. Wu and R. Tóth: SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimation. 2020.
403 M3D-RPN code 9.71 % 14.76 % 7.42 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
404 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 9.33 % 12.81 % 7.86 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
405 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 9.28 % 12.67 % 7.95 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
406 MonoCInIS 7.94 % 15.82 % 6.68 % 0,13 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Heylen, M. De Wolf, B. Dawagne, M. Proesmans, L. Van Gool, W. Abbeloos, H. Abdelkawy and D. Reino: MonoCInIS: Camera Independent Monocular 3D Object Detection using Instance Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
407 Plane-Constraints code 7.88 % 11.29 % 6.48 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
408 SS3D 7.68 % 10.78 % 6.51 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
409 MonoCInIS 7.66 % 15.21 % 6.24 % 0,14 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Heylen, M. De Wolf, B. Dawagne, M. Proesmans, L. Van Gool, W. Abbeloos, H. Abdelkawy and D. Reino: MonoCInIS: Camera Independent Monocular 3D Object Detection using Instance Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
410 Mono3D_PLiDAR code 7.50 % 10.76 % 6.10 % 0.1 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 (pytorch)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Pseudo-LiDAR Point Cloud. arXiv:1903.09847 2019.
411 mdab 7.47 % 11.55 % 6.27 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
412 MonoPSR code 7.25 % 10.76 % 5.85 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
413 Decoupled-3D 7.02 % 11.08 % 5.63 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Cai, B. Li, Z. Jiao, H. Li, X. Zeng and X. Wang: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Decoupled Structured Polygon Estimation and Height-Guided Depth Estimation. AAAI 2020.
414 mdab 6.94 % 10.52 % 5.18 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
415 VoxelJones code 6.35 % 7.39 % 5.80 % .18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Motro and J. Ghosh: Vehicular Multi-object Tracking with Persistent Detector Failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11306 2019.
416 MonoGRNet code 5.74 % 9.61 % 4.25 % 0.04s NVIDIA P40
Z. Qin, J. Wang and Y. Lu: MonoGRNet: A Geometric Reasoning Network for 3D Object Localization. The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19) 2019.
417 A3DODWTDA (image) code 5.27 % 6.88 % 4.45 % 0.8 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson and E. Linder-Norén: Automotive 3D Object Detection Without Target Domain Annotations. 2018.
418 MonoFENet 5.14 % 8.35 % 4.10 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Bao, B. Xu and Z. Chen: MonoFENet: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Feature Enhancement Networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2019.
419 TLNet (Stereo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 4.37 % 7.64 % 3.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Qin, J. Wang and Y. Lu: Triangulation Learning Network: from Monocular to Stereo 3D Object Detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
420 CSoR
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 4.06 % 5.61 % 3.17 % 3.5 s 4 cores @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Plotkin: PyDriver: Entwicklung eines Frameworks für räumliche Detektion und Klassifikation von Objekten in Fahrzeugumgebung. 2015.
421 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 3.87 % 6.88 % 2.83 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
422 MVRA + I-FRCNN+ 3.27 % 5.19 % 2.49 % 0.18 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Choi, H. Kang and Y. Hyun: Multi-View Reprojection Architecture for Orientation Estimation. The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops 2019.
423 SparVox3D 3.20 % 5.27 % 2.56 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
E. Balatkan and F. Kıraç: Improving Regression Performance on Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Bin-Mixing and Sparse Voxel Data. 2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2021.
424 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 3.02 % 3.24 % 2.26 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
425 GS3D 2.90 % 4.47 % 2.47 % 2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
B. Li, W. Ouyang, L. Sheng, X. Zeng and X. Wang: GS3D: An Efficient 3D Object Detection Framework for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
426 3D-GCK 2.52 % 3.27 % 2.11 % 24 ms Tesla V100
N. Gählert, J. Wan, N. Jourdan, J. Finkbeiner, U. Franke and J. Denzler: Single-Shot 3D Detection of Vehicles from Monocular RGB Images via Geometrically Constrained Keypoints in Real-Time. 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2020.
427 WeakM3D code 2.26 % 5.03 % 1.63 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, S. Yan, B. Wu, Z. Yang, X. He and D. Cai: WeakM3D: Towards Weakly Supervised Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICLR 2022.
428 ROI-10D 2.02 % 4.32 % 1.46 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Manhardt, W. Kehl and A. Gaidon: ROI-10D: Monocular Lifting of 2D Detection to 6D Pose and Metric Shape. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
429 FQNet 1.51 % 2.77 % 1.01 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Liu, J. Lu, C. Xu, Q. Tian and J. Zhou: Deep Fitting Degree Scoring Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
430 3D-SSMFCNN code 1.41 % 1.88 % 1.11 % 0.1 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Novak: Vehicle Detection and Pose Estimation for Autonomous Driving. 2017.
431 f3sd code 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
432 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Pedestrian


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 CasA++ code 49.29 % 56.33 % 46.70 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
2 TED code 49.21 % 55.85 % 46.52 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
3 UPIDet code 48.77 % 55.59 % 46.12 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
4 VPFNet code 48.36 % 54.65 % 44.98 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
5 LoGoNet code 47.43 % 53.07 % 45.22 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
6 CasA code 47.09 % 54.04 % 44.56 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
7 EQ-PVRCNN code 47.02 % 55.84 % 42.94 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
8 SDGUFusion 46.84 % 53.10 % 43.45 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
9 PiFeNet code 46.71 % 56.39 % 42.71 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Le, H. Shi, H. Rezatofighi and J. Cai: Accurate and Real-time 3D Pedestrian Detection Using an Efficient Attentive Pillar Network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
10 USVLab BSAODet code 46.50 % 52.69 % 43.10 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
11 ACFNet 46.36 % 54.62 % 42.57 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
12 DPPFA-Net 46.14 % 53.58 % 42.59 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Wang, X. Kong, H. Nishikawa, Q. Lian and H. Tomiyama: Dynamic Point-Pixel Feature Alignment for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2023.
13 OGMMDet code 45.61 % 53.49 % 43.10 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
14 ANM code 45.61 % 53.49 % 43.10 % ANM ANM
15 CAT-Det 45.44 % 54.26 % 41.94 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
16 HotSpotNet 45.37 % 53.10 % 41.47 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
17 MLF-DET 45.29 % 50.86 % 42.05 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
18 ACDet code 44.79 % 53.41 % 41.96 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
19 focalnet 44.74 % 53.27 % 42.63 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
20 SCNet3D 44.64 % 51.69 % 41.44 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
21 focalnet 44.63 % 52.89 % 42.36 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
22 IOUFusion 44.42 % 53.62 % 40.40 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
23 EPNet++ 44.38 % 52.79 % 41.29 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
24 TANet code 44.34 % 53.72 % 40.49 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
25 3DSSD code 44.27 % 54.64 % 40.23 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
26 af 43.98 % 50.61 % 41.79 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
27 R^2 R-CNN 43.90 % 51.42 % 40.69 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
28 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 43.82 % 51.44 % 41.52 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
29 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 43.77 % 51.92 % 40.14 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
30 3ONet 43.45 % 52.81 % 39.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
31 FIRM-Net 43.43 % 51.65 % 40.97 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
32 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 43.38 % 52.16 % 38.80 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
33 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 43.35 % 53.10 % 40.06 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
34 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 43.29 % 52.17 % 40.29 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
35 FromVoxelToPoint code 43.28 % 51.80 % 40.71 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
36 VMVS
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 43.27 % 53.44 % 39.51 % 0.25 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku, A. Pon, S. Walsh and S. Waslander: Improving 3D object detection for pedestrians with virtual multi-view synthesis orientation estimation. IROS 2019.
37 SFA-GCL code 43.24 % 52.90 % 39.37 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
38 P2V-RCNN 43.19 % 50.91 % 40.81 % 0.1 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
39 MGAF-3DSSD code 43.09 % 50.65 % 39.65 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
40 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 43.08 % 52.46 % 40.67 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
41 focal 43.08 % 50.07 % 40.87 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
42 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 43.07 % 52.72 % 39.23 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
43 DGEnhCL code 43.07 % 51.31 % 39.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
44 Frustum-PointPillars code 42.89 % 51.22 % 39.28 % 0.06 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
A. Paigwar, D. Sierra-Gonzalez, \. Erkent and C. Laugier: Frustum-PointPillars: A Multi-Stage Approach for 3D Object Detection using RGB Camera and LiDAR. International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV, Workshop on Autonomous Vehicle Vision 2021.
45 IIOU code 42.81 % 51.27 % 40.30 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
46 KPTr 42.76 % 48.85 % 39.49 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
47 SFA-GCL(80) code 42.76 % 52.05 % 39.03 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
48 Fast-CLOCs 42.72 % 52.10 % 39.08 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
49 HMFI code 42.65 % 50.88 % 39.78 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
50 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 42.55 % 51.78 % 38.79 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
51 STD code 42.47 % 53.29 % 38.35 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
52 LVFSD 42.36 % 51.18 % 39.64 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
53 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 42.27 % 50.46 % 39.04 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
54 SemanticVoxels 42.19 % 50.90 % 39.52 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Fei, W. Chen, P. Heidenreich, S. Wirges and C. Stiller: SemanticVoxels: Sequential Fusion for 3D Pedestrian Detection using LiDAR Point Cloud and Semantic Segmentation. MFI 2020.
55 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 42.15 % 50.53 % 38.08 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
56 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 41.95 % 47.66 % 38.90 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
57 CZY_PPF_Net 41.93 % 47.18 % 40.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
58 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 41.92 % 51.45 % 38.89 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
59 RAFDet 41.89 % 48.95 % 38.66 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
60 BPG3D 41.79 % 48.73 % 39.55 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
61 VPA 41.76 % 49.10 % 38.38 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
62 OFFNet 41.66 % 48.59 % 38.73 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
63 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 41.52 % 49.17 % 39.08 % 0.10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
64 Anonymous code 41.50 % 49.01 % 37.94 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
65 LGNet-3classes code 41.45 % 47.88 % 38.63 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
66 SFA-GCL code 41.18 % 50.41 % 38.97 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
67 PG-RCNN code 41.04 % 47.99 % 38.71 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
68 IA-SSD (single) code 41.03 % 47.90 % 37.98 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
69 DFAF3D 40.99 % 47.58 % 37.65 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
70 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 40.97 % 50.32 % 37.87 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
71 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 40.89 % 46.97 % 38.80 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
72 HA-PillarNet 40.85 % 46.71 % 38.54 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
73 MG 40.85 % 47.79 % 37.37 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
74 RAFDet code 40.71 % 47.82 % 37.43 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
75 CG-SSD 40.64 % 47.35 % 37.71 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
76 PDV code 40.56 % 47.80 % 38.46 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
77 MFB3D 40.40 % 46.46 % 38.20 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
78 SVGA-Net 40.39 % 48.48 % 37.92 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
79 PV-RCNN-Plus 40.31 % 47.50 % 38.15 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
80 DiffCandiDet 40.27 % 49.24 % 37.99 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
81 MLFusion-VS 40.25 % 46.60 % 38.30 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
82 EOTL code 40.11 % 48.65 % 35.99 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
83 PI-SECOND code 39.98 % 50.39 % 35.98 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
84 voxelnext_pcdet 39.97 % 47.46 % 37.43 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
85 M3DeTR code 39.94 % 45.70 % 37.66 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
86 U_PV_V2_ep_100_100 39.82 % 46.11 % 37.68 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
87 centerpoint_pcdet 39.74 % 46.68 % 37.33 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
88 TF-PartA2 39.63 % 47.93 % 37.16 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
89 SRDL 39.43 % 47.30 % 36.99 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
90 Test_dif code 39.41 % 47.24 % 37.20 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
91 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 39.37 % 47.98 % 36.01 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
92 ARPNET 39.31 % 48.32 % 35.93 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
93 HAF-PVP_test 39.29 % 46.71 % 36.64 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
94 bs 39.28 % 46.29 % 37.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
95 BAPartA2S-4h 39.21 % 47.67 % 36.53 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
96 GSG-FPS code 39.17 % 46.47 % 37.10 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
97 L-AUG 39.07 % 46.76 % 35.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
98 IA-SSD (multi) code 39.03 % 46.51 % 35.61 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
99 prcnn_v18_80_100 38.89 % 46.01 % 35.46 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
100 SC-SSD 38.88 % 45.15 % 36.71 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
101 U_second_v4_ep_100_8 38.81 % 46.05 % 36.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
102 SIF 38.74 % 46.23 % 36.06 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
103 RAFDet 38.71 % 46.13 % 36.61 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
104 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 38.66 % 47.83 % 35.70 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
105 GF-pointnet 38.61 % 45.67 % 36.28 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
106 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 38.58 % 46.33 % 35.71 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
107 GeVo 38.54 % 43.66 % 36.53 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
108 PR-SSD 38.52 % 45.08 % 36.23 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
109 AAMVFNet code 38.40 % 44.22 % 35.46 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
110 XT-PartA2 38.22 % 46.24 % 35.51 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
111 HINTED 37.75 % 47.33 % 34.10 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
112 AMVFNet code 37.70 % 44.93 % 34.63 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
113 DVFENet 37.50 % 43.55 % 35.33 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
114 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 37.47 % 47.58 % 35.07 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
115 AEPF 37.46 % 44.97 % 34.51 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
116 PUDet 37.42 % 46.00 % 35.12 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
117 SeSame-voxel code 37.37 % 46.53 % 33.56 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
118 S-AT GCN 37.37 % 44.63 % 34.92 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
119 VSAC 37.02 % 45.26 % 33.35 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
120 PCNet3D 37.00 % 44.66 % 34.16 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
121 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 36.89 % 41.38 % 34.95 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
122 mm3d_PartA2 36.84 % 44.67 % 34.48 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
123 XView 36.79 % 42.44 % 34.96 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
124 IIOU_LDR code 36.58 % 44.42 % 33.52 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
125 SecAtten 36.49 % 44.13 % 34.17 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
126 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 36.07 % 43.93 % 32.86 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
127 VoxelFSD-S 35.71 % 42.78 % 33.26 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
128 SeSame-point code 35.34 % 42.29 % 33.02 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
129 MM_SECOND code 35.19 % 44.12 % 32.02 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
130 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 35.06 % 41.55 % 32.93 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
131 ROT_S3D 34.98 % 42.38 % 33.19 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
132 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 34.59 % 42.27 % 31.37 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
133 MMpointpillars 34.41 % 41.54 % 32.15 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
134 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 32.74 % 43.05 % 29.54 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
135 StereoDistill 32.23 % 44.12 % 28.95 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
136 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 31.46 % 37.99 % 29.46 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
137 P2P code 31.03 % 38.37 % 29.23 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
138 SeSame-pillar code 31.00 % 37.61 % 28.86 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
139 SparsePool code 30.38 % 37.84 % 26.94 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
140 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 30.00 % 40.46 % 27.07 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
141 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 29.77 % 37.21 % 27.62 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
142 SeSame-voxel w/score code 28.26 % 34.14 % 26.15 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
143 SparsePool code 27.92 % 35.52 % 25.87 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
144 ODGS 27.87 % 34.09 % 25.62 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
145 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 27.86 % 36.10 % 25.76 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
146 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 27.23 % 33.87 % 25.27 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
147 CSW3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 26.64 % 33.75 % 23.34 % 0.03 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Wu, H. Fu, Z. Wang and K. Ding: Cascaded Sliding Window Based Real-Time 3D Region Proposal for Pedestrian Detection. ROBIO 2019.
148 PointRGBNet 26.40 % 34.77 % 24.03 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
149 SFEBEV 26.19 % 32.32 % 24.25 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
150 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 25.80 % 37.12 % 22.04 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
151 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 25.40 % 35.75 % 21.79 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
152 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 24.31 % 33.22 % 20.95 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
153 SeSame-point w/score code 23.33 % 31.13 % 20.07 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
154 YOLOStereo3D
This method uses stereo information.
 code 19.75 % 28.49 % 16.48 % 0.1 s GPU 1080Ti
Y. Liu, L. Wang and M. Liu: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
155 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 17.58 % 24.48 % 15.60 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
156 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 17.08 % 22.04 % 15.82 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
157 BKDStereo3D code 15.76 % 23.48 % 13.73 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
158 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 15.55 % 20.53 % 14.15 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
159 BKDStereo3D w/o KD code 14.92 % 21.47 % 12.96 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
160 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 13.96 % 17.60 % 12.70 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
161 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 11.41 % 16.23 % 10.12 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
162 MonoLSS 11.27 % 17.09 % 10.00 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
163 DD3D code 11.04 % 16.64 % 9.38 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
164 PS-fld code 10.82 % 16.95 % 9.26 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
165 CIE 10.53 % 16.19 % 8.97 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
166 OPA-3D code 10.49 % 15.65 % 8.80 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
167 MonoLTKD_V3 10.41 % 16.15 % 9.68 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
168 MonoUNI code 10.34 % 15.78 % 8.74 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
169 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 10.27 % 14.05 % 9.02 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
170 MonoTAKD V2 10.27 % 16.09 % 8.76 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
171 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 10.21 % 15.39 % 8.85 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
172 MonoDTR 10.18 % 15.33 % 8.61 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
173 MonoTAKD 10.00 % 14.88 % 8.49 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
174 GUPNet code 9.76 % 14.95 % 8.41 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
175 MonoLTKD 9.73 % 14.51 % 8.25 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
176 error 9.56 % 14.66 % 8.03 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
177 MonoSIM 9.18 % 14.68 % 7.72 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
178 MonoFRD 8.88 % 13.86 % 7.53 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
179 SGM3D code 8.81 % 13.99 % 7.26 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
180 CMKD code 8.79 % 13.94 % 7.42 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
181 DEVIANT code 8.65 % 13.43 % 7.69 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
182 PS-SVDM 8.33 % 12.93 % 7.20 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
183 MonoNeRD code 8.26 % 13.20 % 7.02 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
184 mdab 8.22 % 12.88 % 6.91 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
185 mdab 8.19 % 12.76 % 6.86 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
186 CaDDN code 8.14 % 12.87 % 6.76 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
187 MonoRCNN++ code 7.90 % 12.26 % 6.62 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
188 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 7.66 % 11.87 % 6.82 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
189 MonoSIM_v2 7.52 % 11.90 % 6.66 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
190 Mix-Teaching code 7.47 % 11.67 % 6.61 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
191 LPCG-Monoflex code 7.33 % 10.82 % 6.18 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
192 MonoDDE 7.32 % 11.13 % 6.67 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
193 RefinedMPL 7.18 % 11.14 % 5.84 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
194 MDSNet 7.09 % 10.68 % 6.06 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
195 Cube R-CNN code 6.95 % 11.17 % 5.87 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
196 PS-SVDM 6.93 % 11.16 % 5.96 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
197 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 6.92 % 10.40 % 6.63 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
198 MonoRUn code 6.78 % 10.88 % 5.83 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
199 MonoPair 6.68 % 10.02 % 5.53 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
200 monodle code 6.55 % 9.64 % 5.44 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
201 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 6.32 % 9.38 % 5.54 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
202 MonoFlex 6.31 % 9.43 % 5.26 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
203 MonOAPC 5.87 % 8.75 % 4.84 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
204 MonoTRKDv2 5.82 % 9.10 % 4.96 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
205 mdab 5.80 % 8.86 % 4.63 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
206 MonoAIU 5.43 % 8.34 % 4.39 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
207 Anonymous 5.28 % 8.07 % 4.29 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
208 FMF-occlusion-net 5.23 % 7.62 % 4.28 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
209 Aug3D-RPN 4.71 % 6.01 % 3.87 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
210 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 4.66 % 7.95 % 4.16 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
211 MonoPSR code 4.00 % 6.12 % 3.30 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
212 DA3D+KM3D code 3.64 % 5.60 % 3.10 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
213 DFR-Net 3.62 % 6.09 % 3.39 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
214 DDMP-3D 3.55 % 4.93 % 3.01 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
215 M3D-RPN code 3.48 % 4.92 % 2.94 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
216 D4LCN code 3.42 % 4.55 % 2.83 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
217 CMAN 3.41 % 4.62 % 2.87 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
218 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 3.37 % 5.53 % 3.02 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
219 DA3D 2.95 % 4.62 % 2.58 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
220 MonoEF 2.79 % 4.27 % 2.21 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
221 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 2.45 % 3.28 % 2.35 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
222 MonoLiG code 1.94 % 2.89 % 1.91 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
223 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 1.87 % 3.42 % 1.73 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
224 SS3D 1.78 % 2.31 % 1.48 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
225 PGD-FCOS3D code 1.49 % 2.28 % 1.38 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
226 SparVox3D 1.35 % 1.93 % 1.04 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
E. Balatkan and F. Kıraç: Improving Regression Performance on Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Bin-Mixing and Sparse Voxel Data. 2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2021.
227 Plane-Constraints code 1.09 % 1.73 % 1.04 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
228 mdab 1.07 % 1.92 % 1.03 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
229 f3sd code 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
230 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
231 MonoGhost_Ped_Cycl 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Cyclist


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 UPIDet code 74.32 % 86.74 % 67.45 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
2 TED code 74.12 % 88.82 % 66.84 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
3 CasA++ code 73.79 % 87.76 % 66.84 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
4 CasA code 73.47 % 87.91 % 66.17 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
5 LoGoNet code 71.70 % 84.47 % 64.67 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
6 MLF-DET 70.71 % 83.31 % 63.71 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
7 USVLab BSAODet code 70.48 % 83.17 % 62.46 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
8 HMFI code 70.37 % 84.02 % 62.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
9 VPA 70.32 % 83.38 % 62.64 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
10 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 69.67 % 83.10 % 62.86 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
11 EQ-PVRCNN code 69.10 % 85.41 % 62.30 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
12 OGMMDet code 68.96 % 82.39 % 62.19 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
13 ANM code 68.96 % 82.39 % 62.19 % ANM ANM
14 CAT-Det 68.81 % 83.68 % 61.45 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
15 CZY_PPF_Net 68.79 % 82.21 % 61.13 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
16 BtcDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 68.68 % 82.81 % 61.81 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhong and U. Neumann: Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
17 RagNet3D code 68.55 % 83.84 % 61.94 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
18 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 68.54 % 82.19 % 61.33 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
19 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 68.45 % 80.43 % 60.93 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
20 ACFNet 68.37 % 84.29 % 62.08 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
21 3ONet 68.37 % 82.34 % 60.20 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
22 HA-PillarNet 68.33 % 83.01 % 61.07 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
23 U_PV_V2_ep_100_100 68.10 % 82.13 % 61.45 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
24 Anonymous code 68.09 % 82.31 % 60.11 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
25 focalnet 67.94 % 80.51 % 61.71 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
26 focalnet 67.87 % 80.49 % 61.57 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
27 DiffCandiDet 67.84 % 83.87 % 60.56 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
28 PG-RCNN code 67.82 % 82.77 % 61.25 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
29 PDV code 67.81 % 83.04 % 60.46 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
30 RangeIoUDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 67.77 % 83.12 % 60.26 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, Z. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeIoUDet: Range Image Based Real-Time 3D Object Detector Optimized by Intersection Over Union. CVPR 2021.
31 SCNet3D 67.55 % 82.11 % 59.65 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
32 PV-RCNN-Plus 67.46 % 80.34 % 60.48 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
33 KPTr 67.29 % 80.73 % 60.38 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
34 AMVFNet code 67.04 % 82.89 % 59.98 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
35 SPG_mini
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 66.96 % 80.21 % 60.50 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
36 AAMVFNet code 66.91 % 81.50 % 59.47 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
37 BPG3D 66.85 % 83.90 % 59.97 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
38 GF-pointnet 66.78 % 80.73 % 59.56 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
39 M3DeTR code 66.74 % 83.83 % 59.03 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
40 HAF-PVP_test 66.62 % 82.65 % 58.82 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
41 ACDet code 66.61 % 83.80 % 59.99 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
42 OFFNet 66.29 % 80.46 % 61.33 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
43 IA-SSD (single) code 66.25 % 82.36 % 59.70 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
44 LGNet-3classes code 66.05 % 78.87 % 59.42 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
45 HotSpotNet 65.95 % 82.59 % 59.00 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
46 PR-SSD 65.94 % 80.01 % 58.71 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
47 DFAF3D 65.86 % 82.09 % 59.02 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
48 FIRM-Net 65.72 % 81.53 % 58.03 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
49 SDGUFusion 65.61 % 79.69 % 59.56 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
50 MFB3D 65.45 % 79.80 % 59.43 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
51 RAFDet 65.36 % 82.25 % 58.75 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
52 Fast-CLOCs 65.31 % 82.83 % 57.43 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
53 GeVo 65.30 % 82.20 % 58.83 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
54 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 65.07 % 81.98 % 56.54 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
55 RAFDet 64.65 % 77.98 % 58.53 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
56 CG-SSD 64.58 % 78.53 % 57.66 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
57 RAFDet code 64.52 % 78.71 % 58.27 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
58 MLFusion-VS 64.48 % 78.76 % 58.61 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
59 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 64.43 % 78.42 % 58.71 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
60 SFA-GCL(80) code 64.23 % 80.94 % 55.74 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
61 3DSSD code 64.10 % 82.48 % 56.90 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
62 VPFNet code 64.10 % 77.64 % 58.00 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
63 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 63.96 % 80.35 % 55.62 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
64 SFA-GCL code 63.84 % 80.39 % 57.20 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
65 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 63.78 % 77.63 % 55.89 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
66 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 63.71 % 78.60 % 57.65 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
67 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 63.52 % 79.17 % 56.93 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
68 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 63.48 % 78.60 % 57.08 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
69 MGAF-3DSSD code 63.43 % 80.64 % 55.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
70 FromVoxelToPoint code 63.41 % 81.49 % 56.40 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
71 U_second_v4_ep_100_8 63.34 % 78.09 % 56.30 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
72 bs 63.30 % 78.70 % 57.12 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
73 focal 63.16 % 79.09 % 58.58 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
74 IIOU code 63.16 % 81.36 % 56.30 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
75 P2V-RCNN 63.13 % 78.62 % 56.81 % 0.1 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
76 BAPartA2S-4h 63.07 % 79.31 % 57.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
77 HINTED 63.01 % 76.21 % 55.85 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
78 XT-PartA2 62.82 % 76.88 % 56.99 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
79 H^23D R-CNN code 62.74 % 78.67 % 55.78 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: From Multi-View to Hollow-3D: Hallucinated Hollow-3D R-CNN for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2021.
80 TF-PartA2 62.68 % 78.61 % 57.06 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
81 SVGA-Net 62.28 % 78.58 % 54.88 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
82 af 62.12 % 76.52 % 56.21 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
83 Test_dif code 62.04 % 77.79 % 55.86 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
84 SRDL 62.02 % 77.35 % 55.52 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
85 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 62.00 % 77.36 % 55.40 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
86 DVFENet 62.00 % 78.73 % 55.18 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
87 IA-SSD (multi) code 61.94 % 78.35 % 55.70 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
88 mm3d_PartA2 61.83 % 76.92 % 55.51 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
89 voxelnext_pcdet 61.74 % 78.18 % 54.68 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
90 S-AT GCN 61.70 % 75.24 % 55.32 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
91 SIF 61.61 % 77.13 % 55.11 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
92 STD code 61.59 % 78.69 % 55.30 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
93 GSG-FPS code 61.47 % 76.84 % 55.36 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
94 SC-SSD 61.33 % 75.58 % 54.63 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
95 IOUFusion 61.32 % 77.93 % 54.83 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
96 PI-SECOND code 61.06 % 77.31 % 55.07 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
97 DGEnhCL code 60.89 % 76.99 % 52.65 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
98 SecAtten 60.65 % 73.85 % 54.87 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
99 prcnn_v18_80_100 60.63 % 78.58 % 54.19 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
100 Res3DNet 60.47 % 76.11 % 53.77 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
101 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 60.30 % 75.42 % 53.81 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
102 VoxelFSD-S 60.04 % 76.63 % 53.72 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
103 MG 59.86 % 78.72 % 53.66 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
104 centerpoint_pcdet 59.80 % 76.27 % 53.02 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
105 SFA-GCL code 59.76 % 78.02 % 53.06 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
106 EPNet++ 59.71 % 76.15 % 53.67 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
107 XView 59.55 % 77.24 % 53.47 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
108 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 59.45 % 77.51 % 52.94 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
109 TANet code 59.44 % 75.70 % 52.53 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
110 L-AUG 59.30 % 73.32 % 53.74 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
111 EOTL code 58.96 % 75.20 % 50.41 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
112 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 58.82 % 74.96 % 52.53 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
113 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 58.80 % 76.26 % 52.21 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
114 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 58.65 % 77.10 % 51.92 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
115 ARPNET 58.20 % 74.21 % 52.13 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
116 MM_SECOND code 57.81 % 73.41 % 51.68 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
117 ROT_S3D 57.61 % 75.17 % 51.65 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
118 PCNet3D 57.28 % 74.15 % 51.02 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
119 IIOU_LDR code 57.27 % 71.42 % 51.38 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
120 LVFSD 57.00 % 75.38 % 50.82 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
121 VSAC 56.99 % 75.54 % 50.90 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
122 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 56.13 % 72.08 % 49.91 % 0.10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
123 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 56.12 % 72.27 % 49.01 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
124 MMpointpillars 55.67 % 69.94 % 50.09 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
125 SeSame-point code 54.56 % 69.55 % 48.34 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
126 P2P code 54.50 % 70.44 % 47.49 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
127 SeSame-voxel code 54.36 % 70.97 % 48.66 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
128 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 53.84 % 65.67 % 49.06 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
129 PUDet 53.53 % 69.10 % 47.48 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
130 PointRGBNet 52.15 % 67.05 % 46.78 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
131 SeSame-pillar code 51.74 % 64.55 % 46.13 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
132 SFEBEV 51.58 % 67.01 % 45.71 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
133 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 51.33 % 65.51 % 45.05 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
134 PiFeNet code 51.10 % 67.50 % 44.66 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Le, H. Shi, H. Rezatofighi and J. Cai: Accurate and Real-time 3D Pedestrian Detection Using an Efficient Attentive Pillar Network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
135 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 50.79 % 67.98 % 45.15 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
136 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 50.55 % 63.76 % 44.93 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
137 AEPF 50.16 % 63.21 % 44.89 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
138 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 49.43 % 68.81 % 42.84 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
139 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 47.72 % 67.38 % 42.89 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
140 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 46.78 % 63.27 % 41.37 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
141 StereoDistill 44.02 % 63.96 % 39.19 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
142 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 43.90 % 62.82 % 39.21 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
143 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 42.08 % 57.19 % 38.29 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
144 SeSame-voxel w/score code 40.05 % 53.37 % 35.71 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
145 SparsePool code 37.33 % 52.61 % 33.39 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
146 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 36.86 % 54.44 % 32.06 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
147 SparsePool code 32.61 % 40.87 % 29.05 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
148 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 30.89 % 47.40 % 27.23 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
149 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 30.25 % 43.98 % 27.21 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
150 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 24.40 % 40.05 % 21.12 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
151 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 24.40 % 40.04 % 21.12 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
152 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 18.53 % 24.27 % 17.31 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
153 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 18.17 % 27.76 % 16.21 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
154 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 16.63 % 29.40 % 14.72 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
155 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 14.29 % 11.47 % 12.57 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
156 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 12.99 % 18.31 % 10.63 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
157 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 12.77 % 22.45 % 11.59 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
158 MonoTAKD V2 8.78 % 14.59 % 7.50 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
159 MonoTAKD 8.51 % 14.12 % 7.23 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
160 SeSame-point w/score code 8.31 % 9.99 % 6.87 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
161 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 7.69 % 13.84 % 6.75 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
162 MonoLTKD_V3 7.23 % 13.54 % 6.86 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
163 CMKD code 6.67 % 12.52 % 6.34 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
164 MonoLTKD 6.38 % 11.44 % 5.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
165 PS-fld code 6.18 % 11.22 % 5.21 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
166 error 5.67 % 9.57 % 4.98 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
167 MonoLiG code 5.24 % 8.14 % 4.45 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
168 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 5.11 % 8.58 % 4.48 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
169 Mix-Teaching code 4.91 % 8.04 % 4.15 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
170 DD3D code 4.79 % 7.52 % 4.22 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
171 MonoPSR code 4.74 % 8.37 % 3.68 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
172 MonoSIM_v2 4.64 % 8.23 % 3.91 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
173 PS-SVDM 4.57 % 7.98 % 3.66 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
174 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 4.54 % 7.13 % 3.81 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
175 MonoTRKDv2 4.44 % 8.01 % 3.68 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
176 LPCG-Monoflex code 4.38 % 6.98 % 3.56 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
177 MonoLSS 4.34 % 7.23 % 3.92 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
178 MonoUNI code 4.28 % 7.34 % 3.78 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
179 Plane-Constraints code 4.22 % 7.72 % 3.36 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
180 mdab 3.80 % 6.79 % 3.35 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
181 MonoDDE 3.78 % 5.94 % 3.33 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
182 Anonymous 3.66 % 6.58 % 3.21 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
183 DFR-Net 3.58 % 5.69 % 3.10 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
184 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 3.50 % 5.48 % 2.99 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
185 OPA-3D code 3.45 % 5.16 % 2.86 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
186 CaDDN code 3.41 % 7.00 % 3.30 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
187 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 3.37 % 5.29 % 2.57 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
188 MonoFRD 3.33 % 6.38 % 3.12 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
189 MonoDTR 3.27 % 5.05 % 3.19 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
190 GUPNet code 3.21 % 5.58 % 2.66 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
191 DEVIANT code 3.13 % 5.05 % 2.59 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
192 CIE 3.09 % 5.62 % 2.80 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
193 SGM3D code 2.92 % 5.49 % 2.64 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
194 PS-SVDM 2.92 % 5.56 % 2.36 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
195 mdab 2.85 % 5.32 % 2.28 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
196 MonOAPC 2.74 % 4.46 % 2.14 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
197 MDSNet 2.68 % 5.37 % 2.22 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
198 Cube R-CNN code 2.67 % 3.65 % 2.28 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
199 monodle code 2.66 % 4.59 % 2.45 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
200 DDMP-3D 2.50 % 4.18 % 2.32 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
201 MonoNeRD code 2.48 % 4.73 % 2.16 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
202 Aug3D-RPN 2.43 % 4.36 % 2.55 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
203 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 2.39 % 4.16 % 1.85 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
204 MonoFlex 2.35 % 4.17 % 2.04 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
205 mdab 2.31 % 4.19 % 2.01 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
206 MonoSIM 2.25 % 4.23 % 2.04 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
207 MonoPair 2.12 % 3.79 % 1.83 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
208 DA3D 1.86 % 3.37 % 1.48 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
209 RefinedMPL 1.82 % 3.23 % 1.77 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
210 MonoRCNN++ code 1.81 % 3.17 % 1.75 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
211 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 1.67 % 2.49 % 1.88 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
212 D4LCN code 1.67 % 2.45 % 1.36 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
213 FMF-occlusion-net 1.60 % 1.87 % 1.66 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
214 SS3D 1.45 % 2.80 % 1.35 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
215 PGD-FCOS3D code 1.38 % 2.81 % 1.20 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
216 DA3D+KM3D code 1.37 % 2.79 % 1.32 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
217 mdab 1.12 % 3.10 % 1.24 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
218 CMAN 1.05 % 1.59 % 1.11 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
219 MonoEF 0.92 % 1.80 % 0.71 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
220 MonoAIU 0.72 % 0.89 % 0.46 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
221 M3D-RPN code 0.65 % 0.94 % 0.47 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
222 MonoRUn code 0.61 % 1.01 % 0.48 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
223 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 0.29 % 0.48 % 0.31 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
224 f3sd code 0.01 % 0.02 % 0.01 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
225 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
226 MonoGhost_Ped_Cycl 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Related Datasets

Citation

When using this dataset in your research, we will be happy if you cite us:
@inproceedings{Geiger2012CVPR,
  author = {Andreas Geiger and Philip Lenz and Raquel Urtasun},
  title = {Are we ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite},
  booktitle = {Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
  year = {2012}
}



eXTReMe Tracker